j
The following is a comparison that highlights the differences between Airrosti and
traditional conventional therapy:
Issues |
Airrosti's Rehab |
Traditional Therapy |
Initial Evaluation |
Airrosti’s treatment model allows for the time to provide a comprehensive evaluation and treatment during the initial visit where a majority of
recovery is often achieved. |
No treatment or recovery is achieved during the initial visit and the initial evaluation is often non-specific with a predetermined protocol for future visits. |
|
||
Films & Imaging Expense |
Airrosti’s detailed assessment, which follows evidence-based clinical guidelines, often prevents the need for expensive imaging and diagnostics. | Up to 40 to 50% of films or imaging are ordered on patients due to the limitations of their initial evaluation. |
|
||
Return to Activity |
After the first or second visit many patients recover up to 95% pain-free range of motion and return to activity even after the most severe pull, sprain, or strain. | On average 3 to 6 visits (up to 2 weeks) are necessary to achieve enough |
|
||
Treatment Planning |
A total of 3 to 6 visits is the average number of visits necessary for a patient to achieve a full recovery. In addition to this Rapid Recovery, patients have a exponentially lower occurrence of re-injury on repetitive motion cases. | On average 18 visits over a 6 week period is often standard protocol for most injuries. Additionally, most of these visits center on supervised exercises and passive care that do little to correct function. |
|
||
Surgeries |
Many surgeries are avoided. | Surgery is often the only alternative offered. |
|
||
Patient Satisfaction |
|
|
